Main Article Content


This research focused on the aspect of speaking skills of the students of Molla Course Tegal where the students' English speaking ability was still quite low. Implementation of Snowball Throwing cooperative learning model was conducted using the Classroom Action Research (CAR). The research subjects were 22 students. The indicator of success was Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) that was 75. Standard percentage of classical completeness was 80%. In pre-cycle, the result of activeness observation was 22.15% with low criteria. In the first cycle, percentage of activeness increased 39.21%, so that percentage of activeness became 61.36% with high criteria. In the second cycle, activeness increased by 35.79% to 97.15% with very high criteria. The increase in student learning outcomes shows that in cycle I, from 22 students there were 16 students or 72.72% of students who have reached completeness score, while 6 students or 27.27% have not yet achieved completeness. The average score in the first cycle was 76.39. In cycle II, the deficiencies were corrected; 22 students (100%) obtained complete learning outcomes with average score of 90.02. Results of the study prove that Snowball Throwing Model increases learning activeness and English speaking skills.


activeness learning outcome snowball throwing cooperative learning speaking

Article Details

How to Cite
Molla, N. L. (2020). Improvement of Activeness and Learning Outcomes of English Speaking through the Snowball Throwing Learning Model. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 124-141.


  1. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri, and Aswan Zain. 2006. “Strategi Belajar Mengajar.” Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 46.
  2. Harmer, J. 2004. “Review: Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice.” ELT Journal.
  3. Hidayat, Rifqi Aziz, Rofiudin Rofiudin, and Endang Sulistianingsih. 2019. “The Effect of Photovoice on Speaking Skills at the Secondary School Level.” Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning 8 (2): 141.
  4. Huda, Miftahul, and M Pd. 2014. “Model-Model Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.” Kaelan, MS (2010). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
  5. Kemmis, Stephen, and Mc Taggart. 2002. “R. 1988.” The Action Research Planner.
  6. Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University.
  7. Meilinda, Nabella Dwi. 2018. “Youtube Videos and Snowball Throwing Technique to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill.” Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran 5 (2): 112–26.
  8. Nunan, David. 2003. “Practical English.” Language Teaching. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  9. Pane, A, and M Darwis Dasopang. 2017. “Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3 (2), 333.”
  10. Purbowo, Gallant Alim, and Putriaji Hendikawati. 2012. “Keefektifan Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing Berbantuan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education 1 (1).
  11. Rubin, Joan. 1975. “What the" Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us.” TESOL Quarterly, 41–51.
  12. Sriyono, Dkk. 1992. “Teknik Belajar Mengajar Dalam CBSA.” Jakarta, PT: Rineka Cipta.
  14. ———. 2018. “Developing Students’ Participation in a Mixed-Levels Reading Class via Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC).” Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning 7 (1): 1–10.
  15. Sulistianingsih, Endang, Sanday Jamaludin, and Sumartono Sumartono. 2018. “Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Tool to Develop Student’s Emotional Intelligence.” Journal of Curriculum Indonesia 1 (2): 33–40.
  16. Suprijono, Agus. 2009. Cooperative Learning: Teori & Aplikasi PAIKEM. Pustaka Pelajar.
  17. Taufiqulloh, Taufiqulloh, Endang Sulistianingsih, and Nur Aflahatun. 2018. “The Effect of Lecturer’s Competence And Learning Environment on Student’s Motivation in Learning English.” English Focus: Journal of English Language Education 1 (2): 60–76.