Main Article Content

Abstract

The message of a speech will be achieved by audiences if the use of speech acts is appropriate with its purposes. There are three types of speech acts; i.e. locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary.  This study aims to know the speech acts used in Emma Watson’s speech delivered about feminism and explore its implications in teaching listening comprehension. Emma Watson tend to bring her audience, especially men to join her campaign, called HeForShe. It has successful reach the world’s attention to end the gender inequality because of her powerful speech. To collect the data, a speech transcript was provided and analyzed. The qualitative descriptive research is used in order to investigate the implementation of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary used in the speech. The result showed those three types of speech acts were used. In addition, the illucationary act of Assertive shown for 76,74%. It indicates that this speech contained opening, informing, convincing, insisting, and clarifying. This results have the implications in teaching listening such as delivering the materials of teaching could be started from listening words by words, looking for the meaning of difficult words, informing the content of text, giving respond, and achieving the meaning of text. The teacher suggested to use this speech as one of material in teaching listening by considering its objectives of teaching.

Keywords

Speech Acts; Illocutionary Acts; Illocutionary Forces; listening comprehension

Article Details

How to Cite
Nur Ekawati, Y., Defika, C., & Sumartono, S. (2021). Speech Acts Reflected in Emma Watson’s Speech: An Analysis and Its Implications in Teaching Listening. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.24905/efj.v3i2.58

References

  1. Ajewole, O. C. (2013). Speech Acts and Welfarist Ideology in Governor Aregbeola's. International journal of English Language and Lingusitics Research , 23-32.
  2. Akinwotu, S. A. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of the Acceptance of Nomination Speeches of Chief Obefami Awolowo and Chief M.K.O Abiola. English Linguistic Research, 2.1, 43-51.
  3. Austin. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Basra, Sri Meiweni and Thoyyibah, Luthfiyatun. (2017). A Speech Acts Analysis of Teacher Talk in EFL Classroom. International Journal of Education.Vol 10 No. 1 August 2017, pp. 73-81
  5. Bach, K. A. (1998). Speech Acts. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. (E. Craig, Ed.) London: Routledge.
  6. Bryman, A., & Burgess, B. (2002). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge.
  7. Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative,quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Vol. 3). California, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
  8. Dylgjeri, A. (2017). Analysis of Speech Acts in Political Speeches.
  9. Darihastining, S. and Sulistianingsih, E. (2020). Speech Act Power in Narrator’s Story of Jidor Sentulan Play in Jombang. In Proceedings of the 1st Bandung English Language Teaching International Conference - Volume 1: BELTIC, ISBN 978-989-758-416-9, pages 65-71. DOI: 10.5220/0008218200650071
  10. Engel, & Schutt. (2009). The Practice of Research in Social Work. Sage Publications .
  11. Hoornsby, J. (n.d.). Feminism in Philosophy of Language: Communicative Speech Acts.
  12. Muttaqin, U. (2013). A Speech act analysis of Zais's Utterances in Moustapha Akkad's Movie the Message. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Adab & Cultural sciences. State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga.
  13. Nastri, J., Pena, J., & Hancock, T. (2006). The construction of Away Message: A Speech Act. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.
  14. Nkechinyere, O. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of The Formal Declaration of Interest For Precidency and Inaugural Speeches of President Muhammad Buhari. Research Gate.
  15. Rosadi, B., & Emalia. (n.d.). Illocutionary Act Seen in Barrack Obama's Speech. Oapub.org.
  16. Searle, J. (1969). Speech act: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Simpson, P., & Andrea, M. (2010). Language and Power. London: Routledge.
  18. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An introduction of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
  19. Wulansari, Y., & Suhartini. (2015). Directive Speech Acts Realization of Indonesian EFL Teacher. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/ .
  20. Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Hongkong: Oxford University Press.
  21. Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language. United States of America: Cambridge University Press: New York.