Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 26 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, blended learning became an alternative way to conduct teaching. To evaluate the implementation of blended learning, this research aimed to collect students’ perception and to know the implementation and the extent of blended learning. It used descriptive analysis design and qualitative approach. The research took place at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kota Tegal with an English teacher and 40 students from third grade as the participants. The teacher was interviewed to collect data on the implementation and the extent of blended learning and the students were questionnaires to share their perception on the blended learning. The results showed that SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kota Tegal implemented anchor-blend type of blended learning since early 2021. Based on the students’ perception, the implementation of the blended learning is not effective during online session. Students gave positive tendency on learning flexibility, offline session, students’ interaction and students’ motivation. However, students gave negative tendency on online session and learning management.  


 

Keywords

Blended learning Students' perception Education amidst pandemic

Article Details

How to Cite
Izzulhaq, N. I., & Meiristiani, N. (2023). EFL Students’ Perception on Blended Learning amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 5(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.24905/efj.v5i1.156

References

  1. Abidin, Z., Rumansyah, & Arizona, K. (2020). Pembelajaran Online Berbasis Proyek Salah Satu Solusi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.29303/JIPP.V5I1.11
  2. Adam, Stewart & Nel, Deon. (2009). Blended and online learning: Student perceptions and performance. Interact. Techn. Smart Edu.. 6. 140-155. 10.1108/17415650911005366.
  3. Alderfer, C. P. (1969) An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142-175.https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
  4. Bersin, Josh. 2004. The Blended Learning Book:, Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. USA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  5. Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199–226). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  6. Brown, G. (2004). How Students Learn. Supplement to the Routledge Falmer. Key Guides for Effective TeachingIn Higher Education Serries. London: Routledge.
  7. Deur, Penny Van and Rosalind Murray-Harvey. (2005). The inquiry nature of primary schools and students’ self-directed learning knowledge. International Education Journal, ERC2004 Special Issue, 5(5), 166-177. Retrieved March 27, 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ903897.pdf.
  8. Driscoll, M. and Carliner, S. (2005) Advanced Web-Based Training Strategies. Blended Learning as a Curriculum Design Strategy. ASTD Press, New York.
  9. Firdaus, Firdaus, Rifqi Muntaqo, and Eli Trisnowati. (2020). “Analysis of Student Readiness for Blended Learning Model Implementation in Industrial Era 4.0.” Indonesian Journal of Science and Education 4 (1): 48. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v4i1.2309.
  10. Gibons, Maurice. (2002). The Self Directed Learning. Retrived February 18, 2020 from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/pendidikan/poerwanti-hadi-pratiwi-spdmsi/maurice-gibbons-self-directed-learning-handbook-challenging-adolescent-studentsexcel-jossey-bass-20.pdf
  11. Gradel, K., & Edson, A.J. (2011). Cooperative learning: Smart pedagogy and tools for online and hybrid courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(2), 193212. https://doi.org/10.2190/et.39.2.i
  12. Graham, C.R. (2006) Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In: Bonk, C.J. and Graham, C.R., Eds., Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, 3-21.
  13. Hall, Sarah. (2015). The hybrid advantage: Graduate student perspectives of hybrid education courses.
  14. Hamalik, Oemar.(2018). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. Sinar Baru Algesindo.
  15. Hege, B.A. (2011). The online theology classroom: Strategies for engaging a community of distance learners in a hybrid model of online education. Teaching Theology and Religion, 14(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00668.x
  16. Horvitz, B. S. (2007). N. Dabbagh and B. Bannan-Ritland, Online Learning: Concepts, Strategies, and Application. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 667–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-007-9071-4.
  17. Isti’anah, A. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning to the Students’ Achievement in Grammar Class. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(1), 16-30 doi:10.15408/ijee.v4i1.5697.
  18. Joyoatmojo, S. (2011). Pembelajaran Efektif Pembelajaran yang Membelajarkan. Surakarta: UNS Press.
  19. King, F. B, (2002). A virtual student. Not an ordinary Joe. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 157–166.
  20. Koç, T. & Uğur, N. G., (2019). Leading and Teaching with Technology: School Principals’ Perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(1), 42-71.
  21. Long, H. B. (2007). Themes and theses in self-directed learning. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 4(2), 1–18.
  22. MacDonald, J. (2008) Blended learning and online tutoring: Planning learner support and activity design. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  23. Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.
  24. Report, M. W. (2020). Severe Outcomes Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) — United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. 2020;69:343-346. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69(12), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2
  25. Ross, Kenneth and Genevois (2006). Cross-National Studies of the Quality of Education : Planning their Design and Managing their Impact. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882146
  26. Rossett, Allison & Frazee, Rebecca. (2006). Blended Learning Opportunities. American Management Association. https://amanet.org
  27. Schank, R, (2001). Educational technology: The promise and the myth. World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, DC Processed.
  28. Seaman, Jeff & Garrett, Richard. (2007). Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
  29. Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., & Casey, D. (2012). Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464– 468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014
  30. Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A Conseptual Model for Understanding Self-Directed Learning in Online Enviroments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning.Vol. 6 (1) Number 1.
  31. Sukardjo, Moch, Nurdin Ibrahim, Helen Purwati Ningsih, and Arif Widodo Nugroho. (2020). “Implementation-Blended Learning in Indonesian Open Junior High Schools.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 10 (12): 638–54.
  32. Tsai, C. W. (2010). Designing appropriate blended courses: A students’ perspective. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(5), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.033 5
  33. Utami, S. (2018). The effect of blended learning model on senior high school students’ achievement. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200027
  34. Yapici, Ibrahim Umit, and Hasan Akbayin. (2012). “High School Students’ Views on Blended Learning.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 13 (4): 125–39. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.74332.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'