Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF) and Writing Feedback toward Teachers’ Beliefs
Abstract
Teachers’ view influences the concepts that teachers teach in the classroom. This study examined the correlation between EFL writing feedback and oral corrective feedback (OCF) toward teachers' beliefs. Data were analyzed by the correlation test. The participants were 100 students from Malang State University (50 females and 50 males, with an average age of 19–22). The findings of this research reveal that the relationship between oral corrective feedback and writing feedback on teacher belief is significant and positive. Oral corrective feedback and writing feedback are effective in the teaching and learning. The results of this study can be used as a reference in applying OCF and writing feedback in the classroom. Teachers' beliefs are crucial and should be considered as one of the success factors for students in learning foreign languages.
Downloads
References
Bao, R. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes: Teachers’ beliefs versus their practices. System, 82, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.004
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.243
Bernat, E., & Gvozdenko, I. (2005). Beliefs about Language Learning: Current Knowledge, Pedagogical Implications, and New Research Directions. Tesl-Ej, 9(1), 1–21.
Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and Evidence:The raw material of second languange acquisition. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Diab, R. L. (2005). Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs About Responding to ESL Writing: A Case Study. TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v23i1.76
Dong, Z. (2012). CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk. 2(2), 35–43.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
Farrell, T. S. C., & Kennedy, J. (2020). “ My Personal Teaching Principle Is’’ Safe, Fun, and Clear’": Reflections of a TESOL Teacher.” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v4i2.20096
Flores, M. A. (2020). Feeling like a student but thinking like a teacher: A study of the development of professional identity in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1724659
Ifinedo, E., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers & Education, 146, 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn010
Li, S. (2018). Corrective feedback in L2 speech production. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–9.
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
Li, X. (2012). Utilizing fairview as a bilingual Response to Intervention (RTI): Comprehensive curriculum review with supporting data. The Role of Teachers’ Beliefs in the Language Teaching-Learning Process. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1317-1329
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
Moorhouse, B. L., Walsh, S., Li, Y., & Wong, L. L. C. (2022). Assisting and mediating interaction during synchronous online language lessons: Teachers’ professional practices. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 934–960.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816644940
Ölmezer-Öztürk, E. (2019). Beliefs and practices of Turkish EFL teachers regarding oral corrective feedback: a small-scale classroom research study. Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1263360
Pawlak, M. (2014). Second Language Learning and Teaching Error Correction in the Foreign Language Classroom. https://doi.org/gg10.1007/978-3-642-38436-3
Prasetyo, T., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). General Teachers’ Experience of the Brain’s Natural Learning Systems-Based Instructional Approach in Inclusive Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 95–116.
Qiu, M., Glass, Z., Chen, J., Haas, M., Jin, X., Zhao, X., Rui, X., Ye, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, F. (2021). Lipid nanoparticle-mediated codelivery of Cas9 mRNA and single-guide RNA achieves liver-specific in vivo genome editing of Angptl3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(10), e2020401118.
Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers’ oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.012
Roy Lyster, & Leila Ranta. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(01), 37–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
Terrell, T. D., & Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. In Language (Vol. 57, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/414380
Truscott, J. (1999). What ’ s Wrong with Oral Grammar Correction. 4, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.55.4.437
Van Ha, X., & Murray, J. C. (2021). The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback. System, 96, 102405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102405
Ya, T. U., Yun, L. I. N., Haoran, Z. H. A., Zhang, J., Yu, W., Guan, G. U. I., & Shiwen, M. A. O. (2022). Large-scale real-world radio signal recognition with deep learning. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(9), 35–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2021.08.016
Yu, S., Xu, H., Jiang, L., & Chan, I. K. I. (2020). Understanding Macau novice secondary teachers’ beliefs and practices of EFL writing instruction: A complexity theory perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100728
Zheng, H. (2009). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
