Main Article Content


This study investigated the effectiveness of the peer-correction technique in writing classes. The participants of the study were the students of a Composition 1 Class in one of the universities in Bandung. There were 8 weeks in the process. The peer-correction was done every week with different kinds of paragraphs. For the first week, the students did peer-correction in pairs. It was to know the rules, what to be corrected and how it had to be done. And for the rest of the weeks, they did peer-correction using a laptop and presented the paragraph through an LCD projector so that each of the students got all the attention in class and also could correct their classmates’ paragraphs together. Data collection methods were questionnaires and interviews. There are 22 statements in the questionnaire sheet and 8 questions in the interview session. The results of the research were; there were 5 advantages of applying the pre-correction technique and 2 disadvantages found.


peer-correction teaching writing technique composition

Article Details

How to Cite
Dezas Perdani, Y. (2020). Peer-Correction Technique in Writing Class. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 4(1), 29-41.


  1. Al Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of King Saud university postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123–130.
  2. Alfaki, I. M. (2015). University Students’ English Writing Problems: Diagnosis and Remedy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 40-52, May 2015. (
  3. Brown, H. Douglas and Abeywickrama, Priyanvada. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Longman.
  4. Cook, Vivian & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). Second Language Writing Systems. Ontario: Cromwell Press Ltd.
  5. Fareed, Muhammad et al. (2016). ESL Students’ Writing Skills: Problems, Factors and Suggestions. Geist Science: Journal of Education and Social Science. Vol. 4 (2): I, 2016.
  6. Ferris, Dana R. (2003). Response to Student Writing Implications for Second Language Students. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  7. Frankel, J., Norman W, and Helen H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies York.
  8. Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing Research in the Real World. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
  9. Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Edinburg: Longman.
  10. Hinkel, Eli. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  11. Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
  12. Hyland, Ken. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Murray, Rowena and Moore, Sarah. (2006). The Handbook of Academic Writing a Fresh Approach. Newyork: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Nation, I.S.P. (2009) Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. NY: Routledge.
  15. Oshima, Alice and Hogue, Ann. (1998). Writing Academic English. New York: Longman.
  16. Oshima, Alice and Hogue, Ann. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing: 3rd Edition. New York: Longman.
  17. Sorenson, Sharon. (2010). Webster’s New World: Students’s Writing handbook 5th Ed. New Jersey: Wiley.
  18. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Wati, A., & Della, A. (2018). Students’ Understanding of Generic Structure of the Text and the Quality of Writing: A Correlational Study. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 37–45.
  20. Wigati, F. A., & Iman, C. H. (2018). Writing an International Journal Article by Indonesian College Teachers: What to Worry About. English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 1(2), 96–107.
  21. Zemach, Dorothy and Rumisek, Lisa A. (2005). Academic Writing: From Paragraph to Essay. Edumond: MacMilan.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'